Layered splits still require multi-service releases—teams then argue across ownership lines.
Microservice Architecture
Microservices for their own sake turn one hard problem into many networked ones.
Split by boundaries, define communication and deploy units—avoid reckless fragmentation.
Split risks
These usually show up before a project starts—or right after a rushed launch.
Poor distributed transactions cause inconsistency—it often surfaces only after production impact.
No shared observability—slower incidents—iteration and local integration slow down.
Local works; shared envs are fragile—users feel it as inconsistent data or UX.
Measured decomposition
Lower coupling with domain events and clear data ownership; timeouts/circuit breakers on sync calls; split pain boundaries first.
First ask if microservices are needed. If yes, split by domain, data ownership and team structure—with gateway, config and observability basics.
- Scope written before coding
- Milestones you can accept
- Handover notes included
Highlights
What this engagement typically covers.
Boundary discovery
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Communication choice
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Data ownership
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Gateway/observability advice
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
What you get
- Architecture note
- Service boundary map
- Comm/data conventions
- Migration phases
- Observability checklist
How we work
-
01
Status/pain interview, with written stage outputs.
-
02
Boundary workshop, with written stage outputs.
-
03
Architecture sign-off, with written stage outputs.
-
04
Pilot split, with written stage outputs.
Ready to lock scope?
Describe monolith pains and team shape—we'll judge fit and phases.